Magento 1 to Magento 2 Migration Is Still Happening in 2026
Six years after Magento 1's end of life, under 15% of Magento stores are still running it - down from nearly 50% in early 2022, but that remaining share carries real, escalating risk. 93% of
Tru Commerce Team · July 14, 2026 · AI Agent Storefronts

Six years after Magento 1's end of life, under 15% of Magento stores are still running it - down from nearly 50% in early 2022, but that remaining share carries real, escalating risk. 93% of Magento 1 sites currently carry a high or critical security risk rating. Here's the current state of migration, honestly.
The numbers, current as of 2026
Magento 1 was end-of-lifed by Adobe on June 30, 2020 - meaning stores still running it have gone more than five years without security patches, modern PHP compatibility, or updates from most third-party extension authors. Under 15% of Magento stores remain on Magento 1 as of early 2026, a real decline from nearly 50% in early 2022, but that remaining minority isn't a rounding error - it represents a meaningful number of mid-market retailers still operating on a platform with a 93% high-or-critical security risk rating.
Why the remaining 15% haven't moved yet
The honest reasons are almost always cost and complexity, not indifference to the risk. Migration timelines typically run 6-14 months end-to-end for mid-market retailers depending on complexity, and cost ranges from roughly $100,000 for a basic catalog migration up to $350,000 or more for a complex replatform involving B2B logic and ERP integration. For a resource-constrained team, that's a genuinely difficult project to prioritize against feature work - until the security exposure becomes acute.
The case for moving now rather than later
Two forces make waiting increasingly costly rather than neutral:
Security exposure only gets worse. Every month without patches on an already-unsupported platform is another month of accumulated, unaddressed vulnerability - this isn't a risk that plateaus, it compounds.
The migration is also your AI-readiness moment. If you're rebuilding your catalog architecture anyway, this is the point to design it agent-ready from the start rather than retrofitting structured schema, feed integrations, and headless architecture onto Magento 2 later as a second project. Doing both at once is materially cheaper than sequencing them.
The upside case is real too: 70% of merchants who migrated reported positive ROI within one year, according to compiled data from Adobe partner case studies and industry surveys - the migration isn't purely defensive spending, it typically pays back.
What a realistic migration actually involves
- Timeline: 6-14 months for mid-market complexity, with most projects landing in the 4-8 month range for less complex catalogs
- Cost: $100,000+ for a basic catalog migration, scaling to $350,000+ for B2B/ERP-integrated replatforms
- Architecture decision: most 2026 migrations land on a headless or composable architecture (Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service, or a fully custom headless build) rather than a like-for-like Magento 2 monolith, since you're already doing the heavy lifting of a full replatform
Building AI-readiness into the migration plan
Since you're already touching every product record during a Magento 1 to 2 migration, this is the lowest-cost point to add complete Product/Offer schema, server-side rendering for AI crawlers, and feed integrations for AI shopping surfaces (ACP, UCP) - work that costs meaningfully more to bolt on after the fact. If your migration plan doesn't currently include this, it's worth adding before the project scope locks. Optimize Your Product Catalog for AI Agents covers the exact checklist.
Book a demo if you're planning a Magento 2 or ACCS migration and want AI shopping visibility built in from day one rather than as a follow-on project.
The upside here is measurable: House of Zelena went from 22% to 56% ChatGPT mention share in 6 months with us - see the House of Zelena case study. If you want to see where you stand before committing, start with the AI Shopping Assistant.
FAQ
Under 15%, down from nearly 50% in early 2022 - but that remaining share still represents a meaningful number of exposed retailers.
Significant - 93% of Magento 1 websites currently carry a high or critical security risk rating, more than five years after Adobe ended official support and patching.
Typically $100,000+ for a basic catalog migration, scaling to $350,000 or more for a complex replatform involving B2B functionality and ERP integration.
6-14 months end-to-end for mid-market retailers, with most projects landing in the 4-8 month range depending on complexity.
Not guaranteed, but the data is favorable - 70% of merchants who migrated reported positive ROI within one year, according to compiled Adobe partner and industry survey data.
Yes - since you're already rebuilding your catalog architecture, adding structured schema and AI-surface feed integrations during the migration is significantly cheaper than treating it as a separate project afterward.
Continue reading
July 14, 2026
Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service Forces Headless - What Changes for Your Team
Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service (ACCS), generally available since summer 2025, is fully managed, versionless, and headless by default - merchandising data flows through GraphQL so frontend
October 12, 2026
How a Claude shopping agent picks products
Anthropic ships no ranking layer. A Claude for Commerce shopping agent reads compact catalog rows of 70 to 120 characters that the merchant's own search returns, adds only server-issued ids to the cart, and never sees the checkout URL. Claude in Chrome reads the page and asks before buying. What is documented, what is not, and who filled the gap.
October 12, 2026
Claude commerce agents: what a merchant has to build
Anthropic's blueprint of 2 September 2026 hands a merchant's engineers a shopping agent, a merchant agent and an 11-method backend contract, and leaves payments, authorization, ranking and fraud to the deployment. The three runtime paths, where MCP enters, Shopify's UCP implementation, and what to build first.